I recently picked up a copy of Judith Warner's
Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety. According to the back cover, the book is meant to be an examination of the "caught-by-the-throat feeling so many mothers have today of always doing something wrong." I was so interested in what she had to say that as soon as I got home I curled up in bed and started devouring it, nodding my head in agreement, reading passages aloud to The Husband.
Modern motherhood is a mess. Check.
There are too many unrealistic expectations. Check.
Moms are often made to feel inadequate, creating a supermom mentality. Check.
But then I read this:
I was angered by the continued onslaught of press reports about the pernicious effects of day care, and the continual beating-up on working mothers. I found the pressure to breastfeed for at least a year, to endure natural childbirth, and to tolerate the boundary breakdowns of "attachment parenting" -- baby-wearing, co-sleeping, long-term breastfeeding and the rest of it -- cruelly insensitive to mothers' needs and adult women. And I was amazed by the fact that the women around me didn't seem to find their lives strange. It appeared normal to them that motherhood should be fraught with anxiety and guilt and exhaustion. It didn't seem to dawn on anyone that there could be another way. I was shocked by the degree to which everyone --feminist or not-- seemed willing to accept the "choices" given to them, even to accept the idea that the narrow paths they'd been forced into living were choices. (pp 15).
And all of a sudden I was uncomfortable. Uncomfortable and a little confused.
The Husband and I like to think of ourselves as
attachment parents. We strive to be the type who try to raise kids that cry to be put down rather than picked up. We babywear, cosleep, and breastfeed. We talk to friends about our choices, a few who do some or all of these things, many who do not. We try to avoid judging or preaching (failing at times), but all in all we've been pretty content with everything.
According to Ms. Warner, however, these things, these attachment behaviours, are all "cruelly insensitive to mothers' needs and adult women." And that's where I got stuck.
Cruel.
To be clear, I'm no advocate of modern motherhood with moms 'having it all' and egalitarian husbands still enjoying 1950s lifestyles. I think many moms are getting screwed by unrealistic expectations, parenting falsehoods and limited childcare options. The way I see it, we're just another generation of women largely expected to choose between a one-income household in a two-income world or leaving our kids to be Raised By Others.
Sure, we may have choices, but they're shit choices.
What really got me about Ms. Warner's statement was that, for me, attachment parenting has been quite the opposite. It's a freedom from convention and expectation. I've dreaded navigating the outside world while pushing my kids around in oversized shopping carts, complete with cupholders. I've worried about the exhaustion of nighttime feeds. I've been less than thrilled with the idea of having to buy, prepare and maintain bottles of formula to free myself from the shackles of motherhood. I've been similarly annoyed at the idea that I have to now buy packaged rice cereal and all the accessories (boxes, bowls, spoons, high chairs, bibs) to give my child the right culinary introduction. I'm also in no hurry to free myself from the one thing that always quiets a fussy baby - not now and not after a year.
And this is where I think Ms. Warner got it wrong.
Shortly after conception, today's mother is expected to step onto an escalator of parenting rules. First, she must make her lists of must-have goods to purchase, then she must read her books, learn about schedules and crying it out, construct a nursery, learn how to maximize cognitive potential, all while buying the required accessories and keeping up with her peers. It seems to me that a mother's
choice is not a choice between conventional parenting and attachment parenting (or whatever else is in vogue at the moment). It's actually not a choice at all -- it's a guideline. A patriarchal prescription for how to mother safely and effectively.
A mother's choice is nothing more than a thinly veiled instruction from 'the experts'.
As such, we don't need freedom from our children but rather, we need freedom from 'others'. For us, attachment parenting has not been about giving our "entire beings over to our child" so much as finding a way to incorporate her into our lives. It
has been the "other way", not the norm or the expectation. I've worn our baby into restaurants, movies, and stores, on the bus, out for a walk and while writing a research paper. By co-sleeping with a side-car style crib, nighttime feeds simply require that I roll over. When she's hungry, having a hard time sleeping or being generally fussy, all I have to do is pull down my top and feed her. None of this is cruel, if anything it's freeing.
At the same time, I can see where Ms. Warner's coming from. I wrote earlier about how I don't really understood the
connection between attachment parenting and anti-vaccine sentiments. As with any style of parenting, attachment, conventional or otherwise, there's always the potential for mothers to take it a step further. To assume that their choices are the best choices and that they, and only they, have their childrens' best interests at heart. Same goes for schooling choices and child care options. We see it in the playground, in our families, on popular social media sites like blogs and twitter, and in organized programs for children. We see moms attack one another and judge one another and avoid one another and just generally behave in a way we'd never permit in our children.
Nowadays, conception nets you a first-class ticket to the mommy-wars.
But what can we do about it? Short of telling our fellow mommy critics to bugger off, how do we move past the judgements and conventions and rules and just parent our children with intention and awareness, while still being mindful of ourselves and those around us?
It seems to me that instead of using terms like 'must have' and 'expert' and 'mommy wars', we need to take a step back and figure out what we're really after. If so many of us are so unhappy, there must not be a 'best way'.
And before you nod your head agreement, saying that there is no best way and why can't we all just get along, take a moment and ask yourself what you could do differently. Because it seems to me that each and everyone of us is living in a glass house with a rather large stone collection.
Do you have any ideas on how we got to this place? Are you an attachment parent or do you swear by schedules and structure? Better yet, do you have your own war story or an anecdote from when you were less than kind with another mother?